The Stratford Public Schools special education program, which serves students with disabilities, was found to be lacking in many areas — including educational benefit for the students — according to a report submitted to the Board of Education in late November 2013 by Capitol Region Education Council (CREC), an outside auditing company hired by the district.
Lack of specialized instruction, inefficient staffing, and inadequate in-district resources, including staff, professional development, and instructional materials, “negatively impact educational benefit,” according to the report. In addition, the auditors concluded that special education processes are not well defined or consistently applied.
On top of that, the report states that financial “resources are not allocated in a manner that would support development and maintenance of quality in-district programs and services.”
“The by-product of dealing with the challenges has been student academic progress that has not met CMT and CAPT state target in any grade level or subject area [in any of the last five years], and Individualized Education Programs (IEP) objectives and progress reports that show limited mastery,” according to the report.
In its study, Capitol Region Education Council looked at the Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) of 30 students, along with documents, reports, in-class observations, parent and staff interviews, and a parent survey.
Along with many suggestions for improvement, the auditors’ report also points to personnel who are working hard and demonstrating impressive care for all students.
Budget implications
Mayor John Harkins’ administration recommended to the Board of Education in mid-2013 that it look for potential cost savings with the help of an outside audit. Now with the auditors’ findings and recommendations in hand, the superintendent of schools, the schools’ chief operating officer and the schools’ director of pupil personnel services all believe that the work called for in the report may result in a request for increases in spending for special education, at least in the short term.
“Without question, there will be some sort of increase [in the budget request for next year],” said Chief Operating Officer Clarence Zachery. “In the long run, we could save.”
Superintendent Dr. Janet Robinson agrees. “You have to spend up front as you develop responsible programs.”
The CREC report shows for the 2013-14 school year that the district’s total special education budget is $21.7 million, which is 23% of the district’s total budget of $95.5 million.
Stratford’s special education budget, as a percent of the total budget, increased from 20% in 2006. The increase and the percent of budget are in line with state averages, according to CREC.
The number of students in the special education program was 760 during the audit period, which is about 10% of the total district student population of roughly 7,500. Ninety-two of the 760 special education students are placed out of district for services at a cost of $6.5 million, or about $70,000 per student per year. The remaining $15.2 million in the special education budget covers the remaining 668 students who are served in-district. That cost per in-district student is approximately $23,000.
More students in district
The audit report notes that Stratford recently reduced its spending for out-of-district placements by about $600,000, but CREC says that even “less reliance on out-of-district placements and outsourcing behavior services is recommended.”
“We recommend these funds be used to work with the increasing mental health needs of the students, increased social work and psychological services, consultation services to support the development and implementation of the strategic plan, to purchase equipment, assistive technology and instructional materials that promote specially designed instruction, and to provide transition staff and special education central office support staff,” the report states.
Robin Marino, pupil personnel services director for Stratford Schools, said she is already looking into bringing more students back in-district. One of the considerations is the number of students with the same group of challenges. If there is only one student with particular needs, it probably does not make sense to have an entire program in-district, but of there are five students in a cluster, it may make sense.
Marino, Zachery and Robinson all point out that when you bring more students in district you need to develop programs, dedicate space, and have the right teachers and paraprofessionals, so it is not all cost savings. Still, Robinson believes there will be a net savings by bringing some of the students currently placed out-of-district back into the district.
Programs and processes
The report states that “training on how to design IEP and deliver specially designed instruction, paired with observations and frequent feedback from both building and central office administrators, is recommended as the most important first step to improve student success. Instructional materials that are different in design and less reliance on Certified Instructional Assistants’ (CIA) support and more planning time for co-teachers is needed.”
Marino, who started working in the district last July, said the administration is working now on IEP development and a new orientation for CIAs who give support but not instruction to help students toward independence. She acknowledges that students can become very dependent on teachers.
In response to the findings “that most processes are not well defined or consistently applied,” Marino said, “We have the processes, but not in writing.”
“We are working on referral packets” for when students transition from a program or from a building, then move buildings, she said, and “we have brought in an outside consultant to help with setting up processes and behavior plans.”
Robinson said, “Plans need to be overseen. There is lots of oversight needed that is not there right now.”
Caseloads and efficiencies
The report also recommends that the special education office “continue their analysis of staffing ratios, caseloads, assignments, hours of service and make necessary adjustments to ensure that services throughout the district are efficient and consistent.”
Marino said the analysis of caseloads and hours of staffing is under way.
Robinson, who also came to the district in July, said, “The right services need to be provided for the kids with the right staff. In Stratford we have hard-working people, but their caseload is very high.”
She also gave an example of inefficiency. “What we do a lot of is have one person shared between schools, so they travel,” she said. “That is not an efficient way to go.” That also requires pulling students out from other learning at the convenience of the traveling teacher, which, Robinson agreed, is not ideal for the education process.
One of the challenges in coming to grips with this audit report, Robinson said, is that there are so many new people in the school administration, including herself, Marino, Zachery, and the director of human resources. However, she considers the CREC audit a “road map for improvement. It shows where we need to improve, and it shortcuts our learning curve.”
“All districts struggle helping children [with learning disabilities] meet target,” said the superintendent. “Meeting target is achievable. We did achieve it in Newtown, and we can achieve it here.”
The full CREC report is available at StratfordK12.org.